|
||||||||||||||||||
Friday, May 30, 2014
This Week on RealKochFacts.com
Video: Shocking End Times Prophecy Fulfilled, Enters The New World Order Via West Point | Pakalert Press
Video: Shocking End Times Prophecy Fulfilled, Enters The New World Order Via West Point | Pakalert Press
Josey Wales
1. All men are more easily inclined towards evil than good.
2. Preach Liberalism
3. Use the idea of freedom to bring about ‘class wars’
4. Any and all means should be used to reach the Illuminati Goals as they are justified.
5. The right to lie in force.
6. The power of our resources must remain invisible until the
very moment it has gained the strength that no cunning or force can
undermine it.
7. Avocation of mob psychology to control the masses.
8. Use alcohol, drugs, corruption and all forms of vice to systematically corrupt the youth of the nation.
9. Seize property by any means necessary.
10. Use of slogans such as equity, liberty, fraternity delivered into the mouths of the masses in psychological warfare.
11. War should be directed so that the nations on both sides
are placed further in debt and peace conferences conducted so that
neither combatant obtains territory rights.
12. Members must use their wealth to have candidates chosen and placed
in public office who will be obedient to their demands and will be used
as pawns in the game by those behind the scenes. Their advisors will
have been reared and trained from childhood to rule the affairs of the
world.
13. Control the press.
14. Agents will come forward after fermenting traumatic situations and appear to be the saviors of the masses.
15. Create industrial depression and financial panic,
unemployment, hunger, shortage of food and use this to control the
masses or mob and then use the mob to wipe out all those who stand in
the way.
16. Infiltrate into the secret Freemasons to use them for Illuminati purposes.
17. Expound the value of systematic deception, use high
sounding slogans and phrases and advocate lavish promises to the masses
even though they cannot be kept.
18. Detail plans for resolutions, discuss the art of ‘street
fighting’ which is necessary to bring the population into speedy
subjection.
19. Use agents as advisors behind the scenes after wars and use secret diplomacy to gain control.
20. Establish huge monopolies that lean toward world government control.
21. Use high taxes and unfair competition to bring about
economic ruin by control of raw materials. Organize agitation among the
workers and subsidize their competitors.
22. Build up armaments with Police forces and Soldiers sufficient to protect our needs.
23. Members and leaders of the one world government would be appointed
by the directors.
24. Infiltrate into all classes and levels of society and
government for the purpose of fooling, bemusing and corrupting the
youthful members of society by teaching them theories and principles
that we know to be false.
25. National and International laws should be used to destroy civilization and enslave and control the people.
The New World Order has been a hidden agenda of secret
societies. The overall plan for world “governance” is a work in
progress. It subject to continuous adjustment by the roundtables as
history moves on down the line.
The ten global bio-regions, (currently economic and banking
regions), have actually have been marked out on a map and given new
names. People living inside those new borders are beginning to vaguely
realize that their national borders are no longer guarded and becoming
quite porous. In spite of nationalistic protests certain boundaries are
in many cases just fading away.
New political boundaries have been mapped out for the world
to conform to the global or geo-economic banking regions that are now
forming. This New World Order map showing ten geo-political regions was created early in 1941 several months before the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor.
The ten future global powers and their eventual leaders have
not yet emerged into history. (Dan 7) But they most certainly will.
Daniel said that these ten powers would rise up in the latter days of
this age. Eventually they would be ruled over by one man, a certain
“prince”. (See Daniel 9:24,25,26,&27.)
All countries will loose what ever sovereignty they have left. Becoming part of a global society, one world government.
For Americans this will be a very traumatic change to their lifestyle. We
take our current peace for granted. But let us take a longer historic
view. The United States looks like being the last in a long line of
western Christian superpowers. Each took their turn in leading the way
throughout the centuries.
But this history must unfold. The chronicles of God’s people
must be written, and they will be written. There will be crises to be
sure. And crisis managers will rise up calling for further compromises.
The money will not be there to deal. And on a terrible future day the flags and sovereignties of nations will folded up and placed down on the dealing table.
The final world system will then emerge, supposedly to try and deal with all this economic and political turmoil. Strange to say, it will be during this time of chaos that the New World Order, under a covering harlot religious system, a prince will sneak in and assume enormous international powers.
Apparently this coming prince will be quite an impressive and
persuasive orator when he comes on the scene. Stepping aside to allow
“the lady” to go first will be his subtle move. Working behind the
scenes he will be a very capable crisis manager on a global scale. He
will pull strings and get things done by treaty, entering into the key
places of conflict in the world, not least of which is the Holy Land and
the city of Jerusalem.
All Christians should understand that it will do them no good
to fight the beast and the coming New World Order for in the scripture
it is written. Revelations 17:17 For God hath put in
their hearts to fulfil his will, and to agree, and give their kingdom
unto the beast, until the words of God shall be fulfilled.
Jesus is coming, evil shall soon taste the rath of the Lord our God.
Critical Reads: More News mainstream Media Chooses To Ignore By Josey Wales, Click Here!
For years, constitution. leaders
in education, industry, the media, banking, etc., have promoted those
with the same Weltanschauung (world view) as theirs. Of course, someone
might say that just because individuals promote their friends doesn’t
constitute a conspiracy. That’s true in the usual sense. However, it
does represent an “open conspiracy,” as described by noted Fabian
Socialist H.G. Wells in The Open Conspiracy: Blue Prints for a World Revolution (1928).
In 1913, prior to the passage of the Federal Reserve Act President Wilson’s The New Freedom was published, in which he revealed:
“Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men’s views
confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the U. S., in the
field of commerce and manufacturing, are afraid of somebody, are afraid
of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so
subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that
they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in
condemnation of it.”
On November 21, 1933, President Franklin Roosevelt wrote a letter to
Col. Edward Mandell House, President Woodrow Wilson’s close advisor:
“The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that
a financial element in the larger centers has owned the Government ever
since the days of Andrew Jackson… “
That there is such a thing as a cabal of power brokers who control
government behind the scenes has been detailed several times in this
century by credible sources. Professor Carroll Quigley was Bill
Clinton’s mentor at Georgetown University. President Clinton has
publicly paid homage to the influence Professor Quigley had on his life.
In Quigley’s magnum opus Tragedy and Hope (1966), he states:
“There does exist and has existed for a generation, an
international … network which operates, to some extent, in the way the
radical right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which
we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to
cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups and frequently does
so. I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it
for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960s, to
examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to
most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to
many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently,
to a few of its policies… but in general my chief difference of opinion
is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history
is significant enough to be known.”
Even talk show host Rush Limbaugh, an outspoken critic of anyone
claiming a push for global government, said on his February 7, 1995
program:
“You see, if you amount to anything in Washington these
days, it is because you have been plucked or handpicked from an Ivy
League school — Harvard, Yale, Kennedy School of Government — you’ve
shown an aptitude to be a good Ivy League type, and so you’re plucked
so-to-speak, and you are assigned success. You are assigned a certain
role in government somewhere, and then your success is monitored and
tracked, and you go where the pluckers and the handpickers can put you.”
On May 4, 1993, Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) president Leslie Gelb said on The Charlie Rose Show that:
“… you [Charlie Rose] had me on [before] to talk about
the New World Order! I talk about it all the time. It’s one world now.
The Council [CFR] can find, nurture, and begin to put people in the
kinds of jobs this country needs. And that’s going to be one of the
major enterprises of the Council under me.”
Previous CFR chairman, John J. McCloy (1953-70), actually said they have been doing this since the 1940s (and before).
The thrust towards global government can be well-documented but at
the end of the twentieth century it does not look like a traditional
conspiracy in the usual sense of a secret cabal of evil men meeting
clandestinely behind closed doors. Rather, it is a “networking” of
like-minded individuals in high places to achieve a common goal, as
described in Marilyn Ferguson’s 1980 insider classic, The Aquarian Conspiracy.
Perhaps the best way to relate this would be a brief history of the
New World Order, not in our words but in the words of those who have
been striving to make it real.
1912 – Colonel Edward M. House, a close advisor of President Woodrow Wilson, publishes Phillip Dru: Administrator in which he promotes “socialism as dreamed of by Karl Marx.”
1913 – The Federal Reserve (neither federal nor a
reserve) is created. It was planned at a secret meeting in 1910 on Jekyl
Island, Georgia by a group of bankers and politicians, including Col.
House. This transferred the power to create money from the American
government to a private group of bankers. It is probably the largest
generator of debt in the world.
May 30, 1919 – Prominent British and American personalities establish the Royal Institute of International Affairs in England and the Institute of International Affairs
in the U.S. at a meeting arranged by Col. House attended by various
Fabian socialists, including noted economist John Maynard Keynes. Two
years later, Col. House reorganizes the Institute of International
Affairs into the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).
December 15, 1922 – The CFR endorses World Government in its magazine Foreign Affairs. Author Philip Kerr, states:
“Obviously there is going to be no peace or prosperity
for mankind as long as [the earth] remains divided into 50 or 60
independent states until some kind of international system is created…
The real problem today is that of the world government.”
1928 — The Open Conspiracy: Blue Prints for a World Revolution by H.G. Wells is published. A former Fabian Socialist, Wells writes:
“The political world of the … Open Conspiracy must
weaken, efface, incorporate and supersede existing governments… The Open
Conspiracy is the natural inheritor of socialist and communist
enthusiasms; it may be in control of Moscow before it is in control of
New York… The character of the Open Conspiracy will now be plainly
displayed… It will be a world religion.”
1931 – Students at the Lenin School of Political Warfare in Moscow are taught:
“One day we shall start to spread the most theatrical
peace movement the world has ever seen. The capitalist countries, stupid
and decadent … will fall into the trap offered by the possibility of
making new friends. Our day will come in 30 years or so… The bourgeoisie
must be lulled into a false sense of security.”
1931 – In a speech to the Institute for the Study of International Affairs at Copenhagen) historian Arnold Toyee said:
“We are at present working discreetly with all our might
to wrest this mysterious force called sovereignty out of the clutches of
the local nation states of the world. All the time we are denying with
our lips what we are doing with our hands….”
1932 – New books are published urging World Order:
Toward Soviet America by William Z. Foster. Head of the Communist Party USA, Foster indicates that a National Department of Education would be one of the means used to develop a new socialist society in the U.S.
The New World Order by F.S. Marvin,
describing the League of Nations as the first attempt at a New World
Order. Marvin says, “nationality must rank below the claims of mankind
as a whole.”
Dare the School Build a New Social Order? is published. Educator author George Counts asserts that:
“… the teachers should deliberately reach for power and
then make the most of their conquest” in order to “influence the social
attitudes, ideals and behavior of the coming generation… The growth of
science and technology has carried us into a new age where ignorance
must be replaced by knowledge, competition by cooperation, trust in
Providence by careful planning and private capitalism by some form of
social economy.”
1933 – The first Humanist Manifesto is published.
Co-author John Dewey, the noted philosopher and educator, calls for a
synthesizing of all religions and “a socialized and cooperative economic
order.” Co-signer C.F. Potter said in 1930:
“Education is thus a most powerful ally of humanism, and
every American public school is a school of humanism. What can the
theistic Sunday schools, meeting for an hour once a week, teaching only a
fraction of the children, do to stem the tide of a five-day program of
humanistic teaching?”
1933 — The Shape of Things to Come by H.G.
Wells is published. Wells predicts a second world war around 1940,
originating from a German-Polish dispute. After 1945 there would be an
increasing lack of public safety in “criminally infected” areas. The
plan for the “Modern World-State” would succeed on its third attempt
(about 1980), and come out of something that occurred in Basra, Iraq.
The book also states,
“Although world government had been plainly coming for
some years, although it had been endlessly feared and murmured against,
it found no opposition prepared anywhere.”
1934 — The Externalization of the Hierarchy
by Alice A. Bailey is published. Bailey is an occultist, whose works
are channeled from a spirit guide, the Tibetan Master [demon spirit]
Djwahl Kuhl. Bailey uses the phrase “points of light” in connection with
a “New Group of World Servers” and claims that 1934 marks the beginning of “the
organizing of the men and women… group work of a new order… [with]
progress defined by service… the world of the Brotherhood… the Forces of
Light… [and] out of the spoliation of all existing culture and
civilization, the new world order must be built.”
The book is published by the Lucis Trust, incorporated originally in New York as the Lucifer Publishing Company. Lucis Trust
is a United Nations NGO and has been a major player at the recent U.N.
summits. Later Assistant Secretary General of the U.N. Robert Mueller
would credit the creation of his World Core Curriculum for education to
the underlying teachings of Djwahl Kuhl via Alice Bailey’s writings on
the subject.
1932 — Plan for Peace by American Birth
Control League founder Margaret Sanger (1921) is published. She calls
for coercive sterilization, mandatory segregation, and rehabilitative
concentration camps for all “dysgenic stocks” including Blacks,
Hispanics, American Indians and Catholics.
October 28, 1939 – In an address by John Foster
Dulles, later U.S. Secretary of State, he proposes that America lead the
transition to a new order of less independent, semi-sovereign states
bound together by a league or federal union.
1939 — New World Order by H. G. Wells proposes a collectivist one-world state”‘ or “new world order” comprised of “socialist democracies.” He advocates “universal conscription for service” and declares that “nationalist individualism… is the world’s disease.” He continues:
“The manifest necessity for some collective world control
to eliminate warfare and the less generally admitted necessity for a
collective control of the economic and biological life of mankind, are
aspects of one and the same process.” He proposes that this be
accomplished through “universal law” and propaganda (or education).”
1940 — The New World Order is published by
the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and contains a select
list of references on regional and world federation, together with some
special plans for world order after the war.
December 12, 1940 — In The Congressional Record an article entitled A New World Order John G. Alexander calls for a world federation.
1942 – The leftist Institute of Pacific Relations publishes Post War Worlds by P.E. Corbett:
“World government is the ultimate aim… It must be
recognized that the law of nations takes precedence over national law…
The process will have to be assisted by the deletion of the
nationalistic material employed in educational textbooks and its
replacement by material explaining the benefits of wiser association.”
June 28, 1945 – President Truman endorses world government in a speech:
“It will be just as easy for nations to get along in a
republic of the world as it is for us to get along in a republic of the
United States.”
October 24, 1945 – The United Nations Charter
becomes effective. Also on October 24, Senator Glen Taylor (D-Idaho)
introduces Senate Resolution 183 calling upon the U.S. Senate to go on
record as favoring creation of a world republic including an
international police force.
1946 – Alger Hiss is elected President of the
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Hiss holds this office until
1949. Early in 1950, he is convicted of perjury and sentenced to prison
after a sensational trial and Congressional hearing in which Whittaker
Chambers, a former senior editor of Time, testifies that Hiss was a member of his Communist Party cell.
1946 — The Teacher and World Government by former editor of the NEA Journal (National Education Association) Joy Elmer Morgan is published. He says:
“In the struggle to establish an adequate world
government, the teacher… can do much to prepare the hearts and minds of
children for global understanding and cooperation… At the very heart of
all the agencies which will assure the coming of world government must
stand the school, the teacher, and the organized profession.”
1947 – The American Education Fellowship, formerly the Progressive Education Association, organized by John Dewey, calls for the:
“… establishment of a genuine world order, an order in which national sovereignty is subordinate to world authority… “
October, 1947 – NEA Associate Secretary William Carr writes in the NEA Journal that teachers should:
“… teach about the various proposals that have been made
for the strengthening of the United Nations and the establishment of a
world citizenship and world government.”
1948 — Walden II by behavioral psychologist B.F. Skinner proposes “a perfect society or new and more perfect order”
in which children are reared by the State, rather than by their parents
and are trained from birth to demonstrate only desirable behavior and
characteristics. Skinner’s ideas would be widely implemented by
educators in the 1960s, 70s, and 80s as Values Clarification and Outcome Based Education.
July, 1948 – Britain’s Sir Harold Butler, in the CFR’s Foreign Affairs, sees “a New World Order” taking shape:
“How far can the life of nations, which for centuries
have thought of themselves as distinct and unique, be merged with the
life of other nations? How far are they prepared to sacrifice a part of
their sovereignty without which there can be no effective economic or
political union?… Out of the prevailing confusion a new world is taking
shape… which may point the way toward the new order… That will be the
beginning of a real United Nations, no longer crippled by a split
personality, but held together by a common faith.”
1948 – UNESCO president and Fabian Socialist, Sir Julian Huxley, calls for a radical eugenic policy in UNESCO: Its Purpose and Its Philosophy. He states:
“Thus, even though it is quite true that any radical
eugenic policy of controlled human breeding will be for many years
politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for
UNESCO to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest
care and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake that
much that is now unthinkable may at least become thinkable.”
1948 – The preliminary draft of a World Constitution
is published by U.S. educators advocating regional federation on the
way toward world federation or government with England incorporated into
a European federation.
The Constitution provides for a “World Council” along with a “Chamber of Guardians” to enforce world law. Also included is a “Preamble” calling upon nations to surrender their arms to the world government, and includes the right of this “Federal Republic of the World” to seize private property for federal use.
February 9, 1950 – The Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee introduces Senate Concurrent Resolution 66 which begins:
“Whereas, in order to achieve universal peace and
justice, the present Charter of the United Nations should be changed to
provide a true world government constitution.”
The resolution was first introduced in the Senate on September 13,
1949 by Senator Glen Taylor (D-Idaho). Senator Alexander Wiley
(R-Wisconsin) called it “a consummation devoutly to be wished for” and said, “I
understand your proposition is either change the United Nations, or
change or create, by a separate convention, a world order.” Senator Taylor later stated:
“We would have to sacrifice considerable sovereignty to
the world organization to enable them to levy taxes in their own right
to support themselves.”
1950 – In testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, international financier James P Warburg said:
“we shall have a world government, whether or not we like
it. The question is only whether world government will be achieved by
consent or by conquest.”
April 12, 1952 – John Foster Dulles, later to become
Secretary of State, says in a speech to the American Bar Association in
Louisville, Kentucky, that “treaty laws can override the Constitution.”
He says treaties can take power away from Congress and give them to the
President. They can take powers from the States and give them to the
Federal Government or to some international body and they can cut across
the rights given to the people by their constitutional Bill of Rights. A
Senate amendment, proposed by GOP Senator John Bricker, would have
provided that no treaty could supersede the Constitution, but it fails
to pass by one vote.
1954 – Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands
establishes the Bilderbergers, international politicians and bankers who
meet secretly on an annual basis.
1954 – H. Rowan Gaither, Jr., President – Ford Foundation said to Norman Dodd of the Congressional Reese Commission:
“… all of us here at the policy-making level have had
experience with directives… from the White House… . The substance of
them is that we shall use our grant-making power so as to alter our life
in the United States that we can be comfortably merged with the Soviet
Union.”
1954 – Senator William Jenner said:
“Today the path to total dictatorship in the United
States can be laid by strictly legal means, unseen and unheard by the
Congress, the President, or the people… outwardly we have a
Constitutional government. We have operating within our government and
political system, another body representing another form of government, a
bureaucratic elite which believes our Constitution is outmoded and is
sure that it is the winning side…. All the strange
developments in the foreign policy agreements may be traced to this
group who are going to make us over to suit their pleasure…. This
political action group has its own local political support
organizations, its own pressure groups, its own vested interests, its
foothold within our government, and its own propaganda apparatus.”
1958 — World Peace through World Law is
published, where authors Grenville Clark and Louis Sohn advocate using
the U.N. as a governing body for the world, world disarmament, a world
police force and legislature.
1959 – The Council on Foreign Relations calls for a New International Order Study Number 7, issued on November 25, advocated:
“… new international order [which] must be responsive to
world aspirations for peace, for social and economic change… an
international order… including states labeling themselves as ‘socialist’
[communist].”
1959 – The World Constitution and Parliament Association is founded which later develops a Diagram of World Government under the Constitution for the Federation of Earth.
1959 — The Mid-Century Challenge to U.S. Foreign Policy is published, sponsored by the Rockefeller Brothers’ Fund. It explains that the U.S.:
“… cannot escape, and indeed should welcome… the task
which history has imposed on us. This is the task of helping to shape a
new world order in all its dimensions — spiritual, economic, political,
social.”
September 9, 1960 – President Eisenhower signs Senate Joint Resolution 170,
promoting the concept of a federal Atlantic Union. Pollster and
Atlantic Union Committee treasurer, Elmo Roper, later delivers an
address titled, The Goal Is Government of All the World, in which he states:
“For it becomes clear that the first step toward World
Government cannot be completed until we have advanced on the four
fronts: the economic, the military, the political and the social.”
1961 – The U.S. State Department issues a plan to disarm all nations and arm the United Nations. State Department Document Number 7277 is entitled Freedom From War: The U.S. Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World. It details a three-stage plan to disarm all nations and arm the U.N. with the final stage in which “no state would have the military power to challenge the progressively strengthened U.N. Peace Force.”
March 1, 1962 – Sen. Clark speaking on the floor of
the Senate about PL 87-297 which calls for the disbanding of all armed
forces and the prohibition of their re-establishment in any form
whatsoever. “… This program is the fixed, determined and approved policy of the government of the United States.”
1962 — New Calls for World Federalism. In a study titled, A World Effectively Controlled by the United Nations, CFR member Lincoln Bloomfield states:
“… if the communist dynamic was greatly abated, the West might lose whatever incentive it has for world government.”
The Future of Federalism by author Nelson Rockefeller is published. The one-time Governor of New York, claims that current events compellingly demand a “new world order,” as the old order is crumbling, and there is “a new and free order struggling to be born.” Rockefeller says there is:
“a fever of nationalism… [but] the nation-state is
becoming less and less competent to perform its international political
tasks….These are some of the reasons pressing us to lead vigorously
toward the true building of a new world order… [with] voluntary service…
and our dedicated faith in the brotherhood of all mankind…. Sooner
perhaps than we may realize… there will evolve the bases for a federal
structure of the free world.”
1963 – J. William Fulbright, Chairman of the Senate
Foreign Relations Committee speaks at a symposium sponsored by the Fund
for the Republic, a left-wing project of the Ford Foundation:
“The case for government by elites is irrefutable… government by the people is possible but highly improbable.”
1964 – Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook II is published. Author Benjamin Bloom states:
“… a large part of what we call ‘good teaching’ is the
teacher’s ability to attain affective objectives through challenging the
students’ fixed beliefs.”
His Outcome-Based Education (OBE) method of teaching would first be tried as Mastery Learning
in Chicago schools. After five years, Chicago students’ test scores had
plummeted causing outrage among parents. OBE would leave a trail of
wreckage wherever it would be tried and under whatever name it would be
used. At the same time, it would become crucial to globalists for
overhauling the education system to promote attitude changes among
school students.
1964 — Visions of Order by Richard Weaver is published. He describes:
“progressive educators as a ‘revolutionary cabal’ engaged
in ‘a systematic attempt to undermine society’s traditions and
beliefs.’”
1967 – Richard Nixon calls for New World Order.
In Asia after Vietnam, in the October issue of Foreign Affairs, Nixon
writes of nations’ dispositions to evolve regional approaches to
development needs and to the evolution of a “new world order.”
1968 – Joy Elmer Morgan, former editor of the NEA Journal publishes The American Citizens Handbook in which he says:
“the coming of the United Nations and the urgent
necessity that it evolve into a more comprehensive form of world
government places upon the citizens of the United States an increased
obligation to make the most of their citizenship which now widens into
active world citizenship.”
July 26, 1968 – Nelson Rockefeller pledges support of the New World Order. In an Associated Press report, Rockefeller pledges that, “as President, he would work toward international creation of a new world order.”
1970 – Education and the mass media promote world order. In Thinking About A New World Order for the Decade 1990, author Ian Baldwin, Jr. asserts that:
“… the World Law Fund has begun a worldwide research and
educational program that will introduce a new, emerging discipline —
world order — into educational curricula throughout the world… and to
concentrate some of its energies on bringing basic world order concepts
into the mass media again on a worldwide level.”
1972 – President Nixon visits China. In his toast to
Chinese Premier Chou En-lai, former CFR member and now President,
Richard Nixon, expresses “the hope that each of us has to build a new world order.”
May 18, 1972 – In speaking of the coming of world government, Roy M. Ash, director of the Office of Management and Budget, declares that:
“within two decades the institutional framework for a
world economic community will be in place… [and] aspects of individual
sovereignty will be given over to a supernational authority.”
1973 – The Trilateral Commission is
established. Banker David Rockefeller organizes this new private body
and chooses Zbigniew Brzezinski, later National Security Advisor to
President Carter, as the Commission’s first director and invites Jimmy
Carter to become a founding member.
1973 — Humanist Manifesto II is published:
“The next century can be and should be the humanistic
century… we stand at the dawn of a new age… a secular society on a
planetary scale…. As non-theists we begin with humans not God, nature
not deity… we deplore the division of humankind on nationalistic
grounds…. Thus we look to the development of a system of world law and a
world order based upon transnational federal government…. The true
revolution is occurring.”
April, 1974 – Former U. S. Deputy Assistant Secretary of State, Trilateralist and CFR member Richard Gardner’s article The Hard Road to World Order is published in the CFR’s Foreign Affairs where he states that:
“the ‘house of world order’ will have to be built from
the bottom up rather than from the top down… but an end run around
national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much
more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.”
1974 – The World Conference of Religion for Peace, held in Louvain, Belgium is held. Douglas Roche presents a report entitled We Can Achieve a New World Order.
The U.N. calls for wealth redistribution: In a report entitled New International Economic Order, the U.N. General Assembly outlines a plan to redistribute the wealth from the rich to the poor nations.
1975 – A study titled, A New World Order,
is published by the Center of International Studies, Woodrow Wilson
School of Public and International Studies, Princeton University.
1975 – In Congress, 32 Senators and 92 Representatives sign A Declaration of Interdependence, written by historian Henry Steele Commager. The Declaration states that:
“we must join with others to bring forth a new world
order… Narrow notions of national sovereignty must not be permitted to
curtail that obligation.”
Congresswoman Marjorie Holt refuses to sign the Declaration saying:
“It calls for the surrender of our national sovereignty
to international organizations. It declares that our economy should be
regulated by international authorities. It proposes that we enter a ‘new
world order’ that would redistribute the wealth created by the American
people.”
1975 – Retired Navy Admiral Chester Ward, former
Judge Advocate General of the U.S. Navy and former CFR member, writes in
a critique that the goal of the CFR is the “submergence of U. S. sovereignty and national independence into an all powerful one-world government… “
1975 — Kissinger on the Couch is published. Authors Phyllis Schlafly and former CFR member Chester Ward state:
“Once the ruling members of the CFR have decided that the
U.S. government should espouse a particular policy, the very
substantial research facilities of the CFR are put to work to develop
arguments, intellectual and emotional, to support the new policy and to
confound, discredit, intellectually and politically, any opposition… “
1976 – RIO: Reshaping the International Order is published by the globalist Club of Rome, calling for a new international order, including an economic redistribution of wealth.
1977 – The Third Try at World Order is published. Author Harlan Cleveland of the Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies calls for:
“changing Americans’ attitudes and institutions” for “complete disarmament (except for international soldiers)” and “for individual entitlement to food, health and education.”
1977 — Imperial Brain Trust by Laurence
Shoup and William Minter is published. The book takes a critical look at
the Council on Foreign Relations with chapters such as: Shaping a New World Order: The Council’s Blueprint for Global Hegemony, 1939-1944 and Toward the 1980′s: The Council’s Plans for a New World Order.
1977 — The Trilateral Connection appears in the July edition of Atlantic Monthly. Written by Jeremiah Novak, it says:
“For the third time in this century, a group of American
schools, businessmen, and government officials is planning to fashion a
New World Order… “
1977 – Leading educator Mortimer Adler publishes Philosopher at Large in which he says:
“… if local civil government is necessary for local civil peace, then world civil government is necessary for world peace.”
1979 – Barry Goldwater, retiring Republican Senator from Arizona, publishes his autobiography With No Apologies. He writes:
“In my view The Trilateral Commission represents a
skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four
centers of power — political, monetary, intellectual, and
ecclesiastical. All this is to be done in the interest of creating a
more peaceful, more productive world community. What the Trilateralists
truly intend is the creation of a worldwide economic power superior to
the political governments of the nation-states involved. They believe
the abundant materialism they propose to create will overwhelm existing
differences. As managers and creators of the system they will rule the
future.”
1984 — The Power to Lead is published. Author James McGregor Burns admits:
“The framers of the U.S. constitution have simply been
too shrewd for us. The have outwitted us. They designed separate
institutions that cannot be unified by mechanical linkages, frail
bridges, tinkering. If we are to ‘turn the Founders upside down’ — we
must directly confront the constitutional structure they erected.”
1985 – Norman Cousins, the honorary chairman of Planetary Citizens for the World We Chose, is quoted in Human Events:
“World government is coming, in fact, it is inevitable. No arguments for or against it can change that fact.”
Cousins was also president of the World Federalist Association, an affiliate of the World Association for World Federation (WAWF), headquartered in Amsterdam. WAWF is a leading force for world federal government and is accredited by the U.N. as a Non-Governmental Organization.
1987 — The Secret Constitution and the Need for Constitutional Change is sponsored in part by the Rockefeller Foundation. Some thoughts of author Arthur S. Miller are:
“… a pervasive system of thought control exists in the
United States… the citizenry is indoctrinated by employment of the mass
media and the system of public education… people are told what to think
about… the old order is crumbling… Nationalism should be seen as a
dangerous social disease… A new vision is required to plan and manage
the future, a global vision that will transcend national boundaries and
eliminate the poison of nationalistic solutions… a new Constitution is
necessary.”
1988 – Former Under-secretary of State and CFR member George Ball in a January 24 interview in the New York Times says:
“The Cold War should no longer be the kind of obsessive
concern that it is. Neither side is going to attack the other
deliberately… If we could internationalize by using the U.N. in
conjunction with the Soviet Union, because we now no longer have to
fear, in most cases, a Soviet veto, then we could begin to transform the
shape of the world and might get the U.N. back to doing something
useful… Sooner or later we are going to have to face restructuring our
institutions so that they are not confined merely to the nation-states.
Start first on a regional and ultimately you could move to a world
basis.“
December 7, 1988 – In an address to the U.N., Mikhail Gorbachev calls for mutual consensus:
“World progress is only possible through a search for universal human consensus as we move forward to a new world order.”
May 12, 1989 – President Bush invites the Soviets to join World Order.
Speaking to the graduating class at Texas A&M University, Mr. Bush
states that the United States is ready to welcome the Soviet Union “back into the world order.”
1989 – Carl Bernstein’s (Woodward and Bernstein of Watergate fame) book Loyalties: A Son’s Memoir is published. His father and mother had been members of the Communist party. Bernstein’s father tells his son about the book:
“You’re going to prove [Sen. Joseph] McCarthy was right,
because all he was saying is that the system was loaded with Communists.
And he was right… I’m worried about the kind of book you’re going to
write and about cleaning up McCarthy. The problem is that everybody said
he was a liar; you’re saying he was right… I agree that the Party was a
force in the country.”
1990 — The World Federalist Association
faults the American press. Writing in their Summer/Fall newsletter,
Deputy Director Eric Cox describes world events over the past year or
two and declares:
“It’s sad but true that the slow-witted American press
has not grasped the significance of most of these developments. But most
federalists know what is happening… And they are not frightened by the
old bug-a-boo of sovereignty.”
September 11, 1990 – President Bush calls the Gulf War an opportunity for the New World Order. In an address to Congress entitled Toward a New World Order, Mr. Bush says:
“The crisis in the Persian Gulf offers a rare opportunity
to move toward an historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled
times… a new world order can emerge in which the nations of the world,
east and west, north and south, can prosper and live in harmony…. Today
the new world is struggling to be born.”
September 25, 1990 – In an address to the U.N., Soviet Foreign Minister Eduard Shevardnadze describes Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait as “an act of terrorism [that] has been perpetrated against the emerging New World Order.” On December 31, Gorbachev declares that the New World Order would be ushered in by the Gulf Crisis.
October 1, 1990 – In a U.N. address, President Bush speaks of the:
“… collective strength of the world community expressed
by the U.N. … an historic movement towards a new world order… a new
partnership of nations… a time when humankind came into its own… to
bring about a revolution of the spirit and the mind and begin a journey
into a… new age.”
1991 – Author Linda MacRae-Campbell publishes How to Start a Revolution at Your School in the publication In Context. She promotes the use of “change agents” as “self-acknowledged revolutionaries” and “co-conspirators.”
1991 – President Bush praises the New World Order in a State of Union Message:
“What is at stake is more than one small country, it is a
big idea — a new world order… to achieve the universal aspirations of
mankind… based on shared principles and the rule of law…. The
illumination of a thousand points of light…. The winds of change are
with us now.”
February 6, 1991 – President Bush tells the Economic Club of New York:
“My vision of a new world order foresees a United Nations with a revitalized peacekeeping function.”
June, 1991 – The Council on Foreign Relations co-sponsors an assembly Rethinking America’s Security: Beyond Cold War to New World Order
which is attended by 65 prestigious members of government, labor,
academia, the media, military, and the professions from nine countries.
Later, several of the conference participants joined some 100 other
world leaders for another closed door meeting of the Bilderberg Society in Baden Baden, Germany. The Bilderbergers
also exert considerable clout in determining the foreign policies of
their respective governments. While at that meeting, David Rockefeller
said in a speech:
“We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York
Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have
attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for
almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our
plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity
during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and
prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational
sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely
preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past
centuries.”
July, 1991 – The Southeastern World Affairs Institute discusses the New World Order. In a program, topics include, Legal Structures for a New World Order and The United Nations: From its Conception to a New World Order.
Participants include a former director of the U.N.’s General Legal
Division, and a former Secretary General of International Planned
Parenthood.
Late July, 1991 – On a Cable News Network program,
CFR member and former CIA director Stansfield Turner (Rhodes scholar),
when asked about Iraq, responded:
“We have a much bigger objective. We’ve got to look at
the long run here. This is an example — the situation between the United
Nations and Iraq — where the United Nations is deliberately intruding
into the sovereignty of a sovereign nation… Now this is a marvelous
precedent (to be used in) all countries of the world… “
October 29, 1991 – David Funderburk, former U. S. Ambassador to Romania, tells a North Carolina audience:
“George Bush has been surrounding himself with people who
believe in one-world government. They believe that the Soviet system
and the American system are converging.” The vehicle to bring this
about, said Funderburk, is the United Nations, “the majority of whose
166 member states are socialist, atheist, and anti-American.”
Funderburk served as ambassador in Bucharest from 1981 to 1985, when
he resigned in frustration over U.S. support of the oppressive regime of
the late Rumanian dictator, Nicolae Ceausescu.
October 30, 1991: – President Gorbachev at the Middle East Peace Talks in Madrid states:
“We are beginning to see practical support. And this is a
very significant sign of the movement towards a new era, a new age… We
see both in our country and elsewhere… ghosts of the old thinking… When
we rid ourselves of their presence, we will be better able to move
toward a new world order… relying on the relevant mechanisms of the
United Nations.”
Elsewhere, in Alexandria, Virginia, Elena Lenskaya, Counsellor to the
Minister of Education of Russia, delivers the keynote address for a
program titled, Education for a New World Order.
1992 — The Twilight of Sovereignty by CFR member (and former Citicorp Chairman) Walter Wriston is published, in which he claims:
“A truly global economy will require … compromises of national sovereignty… There is no escaping the system.”
1992 — The United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) Earth Summit
takes place in Rio de Janeiro this year, headed by Conference
Secretary-General Maurice Strong. The main products of this summit are
the Biodiversity Treaty and Agenda 21, which the U.S. hesitates to sign
because of opposition at home due to the threat to sovereignty and
economics. The summit says the first world’s wealth must be transferred
to the third world.
July 20, 1992 – Time magazine publishes The Birth of the Global Nation by Strobe Talbott, Rhodes Scholar, roommate of Bill Clinton at Oxford University, CFR Director, and Trilateralist, in which he writes:
“All countries are basically social arrangements… No
matter how permanent or even sacred they may seem at any one time, in
fact they are all artificial and temporary… Perhaps national sovereignty
wasn’t such a great idea after all… But it has taken the events in our
own wondrous and terrible century to clinch the case for world
government.”
As an editor of Time, Talbott defended Clinton during his
presidential campaign. He was appointed by President Clinton as the
number two person at the State Department behind Secretary of State
Warren Christopher, former Trilateralist and former CFR Vice-Chairman
and Director. Talbott was confirmed by about two-thirds of the U.S.
Senate despite his statement about the unimportance of national
sovereignty.
September 29, 1992 – At a town hall meeting in Los Angeles, Trilateralist and former CFR president Winston Lord delivers a speech titled Changing Our Ways: America and the New World, in which he remarks:
“To a certain extent, we are going to have to yield some
of our sovereignty, which will be controversial at home… [Under] the
North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)… some Americans are going to
be hurt as low-wage jobs are taken away.”
Lord became an Assistant Secretary of State in the Clinton administration.
1992 – President Bush addressing the General Assembly of the U.N said:
“It is the sacred principles enshrined in the United
Nations charter to which the American people will henceforth pledge
their allegiance.”
Winter, 1992-93 – The CFR’s Foreign Affairs publishes Empowering the United Nations by U.N. Secretary General Boutros-Boutros Ghali, who asserts:
“It is undeniable that the centuries-old doctrine of
absolute and exclusive sovereignty no longer stands… Underlying the
rights of the individual and the rights of peoples is a dimension of
universal sovereignty that resides in all humanity… It is a sense that
increasingly finds expression in the gradual expansion of international
law… In this setting the significance of the United Nations should be
evident and accepted.”
1993 – Strobe Talbott receives the Norman Cousins Global Governance Award for his 1992 Time article, The Birth of the Global Nation
and in appreciation for what he has done “for the cause of global
governance.” President Clinton writes a letter of congratulation which
states:
“Norman Cousins worked for world peace and world
government…. Strobe Talbott’s lifetime achievements as a voice for
global harmony have earned him this recognition… He will be a worthy
recipient of the Norman Cousins Global Governance Award. Best wishes…
for future success.”
Not only does President Clinton use the specific term, “world
government,” but he also expressly wishes the WFA “future success” in
pursuing world federal government. Talbott proudly accepts the award,
but says the WFA should have given it to the other nominee, Mikhail
Gorbachev.
July 18, 1993 – CFR member and Trilateralist Henry Kissinger writes in the Los Angeles Times concerning NAFTA:
“What Congress will have before it is not a conventional
trade agreement but the architecture of a new international system… a
first step toward a new world order.”
August 23, 1993 – Christopher Hitchens, Socialist friend of Bill Clinton when he was at Oxford University, says in a C-SPAN interview:
“… it is, of course the case that there is a ruling class in this country, and that it has allies internationally.”
October 30, 1993 – Washington Post ombudsman Richard Harwood does an op-ed piece about the role of the CFR’s media members:
“Their membership is an acknowledgment of their ascension
into the American ruling class [where] they do not merely analyze and
interpret foreign policy for the United States; they help make it.”
January/February, 1994 – The CFR’s Foreign Affairs
prints an opening article by CFR Senior Fellow Michael Clough in which
he writes that the “Wise Men” (e.g. Paul Nitze, Dean Acheson, George
Kennan, and John J. McCloy) have:
“assiduously guarded it [American foreign policy] for the
past 50 years… They ascended to power during World War II… This was as
it should be. National security and the national interest, they argued
must transcend the special interests and passions of the people who make
up America… How was this small band of Atlantic-minded
internationalists able to triumph … Eastern internationalists were able
to shape and staff the burgeoning foreign policy institutions… As long
as the Cold War endured and nuclear Armageddon seemed only a missile
away, the public was willing to tolerate such an undemocratic foreign
policy making system.”
1994 – In the Human Development Report, published by the UN Development Program, there was a section called “Global Governance For the 21st Century”.
The administrator for this program was appointed by Bill Clinton. His
name is James Gustave Speth. The opening sentence of the report said:
“Mankind’s problems can no longer be solved by national
government. What is needed is a World Government. This can best be
achieved by strengthening the United Nations system.”
1995 – The State of the World Forum took place in
the fall of this year, sponsored by the Gorbachev Foundation located at
the Presidio in San Francisco. Foundation President Jim Garrison chairs
the meeting of who’s-whos from around the world including Margaret
Thatcher, Maurice Strong, George Bush, Mikhail Gorbachev and others.
Conversation centers around the oneness of mankind and the coming global
government. However, the term “global governance” is now used in place
of “new world order” since the latter has become a political liability,
being a lightning rod for opponents of global government.
1996 – The United Nations 420-page report Our Global Neighborhood is published. It outlines a plan for “global governance,” calling for an international Conference on Global Governance in 1998 for the purpose of submitting to the world the necessary treaties and agreements for ratification by the year 2000.
Josey Wales
Propaganda is a form of communication aimed towards influencing the attitude of a population toward some cause or position. The New World Order is coming. Once you understand what this New World Order really is, and how it is being gradually implemented, you will be able to see it progressing in your daily lives!
President Obama is facing criticism for his declaration last week that he would seek a new “international order” (New World Order)
with many Americans questioning how much U.S. sovereignty Obama and his
the administration are willing to cede in exchange for more global
cooperation.
with many Americans questioning how much U.S. sovereignty Obama and his
the administration are willing to cede in exchange for more global
cooperation.
President Obama disclosed his plans to create an “International Order (New World Order) in two seperate speechs once at Palais des Beaux Arts Brussels, Belgium and once at West Point Military Academy Commencement Ceremony.
Obama, delivering the commencement speech Saturday at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, said that “stronger International Standards and
institutions” and stronger alliances can “resolve” challenges ranging
from terrorism to nuclear proliferation to climate change to economic
decline.
institutions” and stronger alliances can “resolve” challenges ranging
from terrorism to nuclear proliferation to climate change to economic
decline.
“Our adversaries would
like to see America sap its strength by overextending our power,” Obama
said. “So we have to shape an international order that can meet the
challenges of our generation.”
like to see America sap its strength by overextending our power,” Obama
said. “So we have to shape an international order that can meet the
challenges of our generation.”
“Our adversaries would
like to see America sap its strength by overextending our power,” Obama
said. - Meanwhile President Obama buries America with so much DEBT that America will never be able to repay the money it has borrowed. At the same time Obama reduces the United States Military to Pre World War II levels. How would our adversaries sap America’s strenght?
like to see America sap its strength by overextending our power,” Obama
said. - Meanwhile President Obama buries America with so much DEBT that America will never be able to repay the money it has borrowed. At the same time Obama reduces the United States Military to Pre World War II levels. How would our adversaries sap America’s strenght?
Then President Obama goes on to say that efforts by America’s armed forces need to be “complemented” with greater Diplomatic Engagement ”from
grand capitals to dangerous outposts,” more humanitarian assistance to
needy nations, better communications among intelligence agencies, first
responders to act after earthquakes, storms and disease and “law enforcement that can strengthen judicial systems abroad, and protect us at home.”
grand capitals to dangerous outposts,” more humanitarian assistance to
needy nations, better communications among intelligence agencies, first
responders to act after earthquakes, storms and disease and “law enforcement that can strengthen judicial systems abroad, and protect us at home.”
“America has not succeeded by
stepping outside the currents of cooperation; we have succeeded by
steering those currents in the direction of liberty and justice — so
nations thrive by meeting their responsibilities, and face consequences
when they don’t,” he told the graduating class at the military academy.
stepping outside the currents of cooperation; we have succeeded by
steering those currents in the direction of liberty and justice — so
nations thrive by meeting their responsibilities, and face consequences
when they don’t,” he told the graduating class at the military academy.
Now what might well be the
last remaining superpower is trying to provide covering for a just and
prosperous peace in the world.
last remaining superpower is trying to provide covering for a just and
prosperous peace in the world.
“This engagement is not an end in itself. The international order (New
World Order) we seek is one that can resolve the challenges of our
times — countering violent extremism and insurgency; stopping the spread
of nuclear weapons and securing nuclear materials; combating a changing
climate and sustaining global growth; helping countries feed themselves
and care for their sick; preventing conflict and healing its wounds,”
President Obama said.
World Order) we seek is one that can resolve the challenges of our
times — countering violent extremism and insurgency; stopping the spread
of nuclear weapons and securing nuclear materials; combating a changing
climate and sustaining global growth; helping countries feed themselves
and care for their sick; preventing conflict and healing its wounds,”
President Obama said.
Obama’s address at West Point
also drew a split reaction. Conservatives claimed Obama was putting
undue faith in global institutions while Progressives said he was
rightly turning away from Bush-era policy.
also drew a split reaction. Conservatives claimed Obama was putting
undue faith in global institutions while Progressives said he was
rightly turning away from Bush-era policy.
But his West Point speech struck
many as a stretch — particularly since efforts at the United Nations so
far have done little to halt nuclear development in Iran and North Korea.
many as a stretch — particularly since efforts at the United Nations so
far have done little to halt nuclear development in Iran and North Korea.
The commencement address follows Obama’s speech at the close of a nuclear security summit in Washington last month in which he said the United States is a superpower “whether we like it or not.”
President Obama’s speech to the European Youth in Brussels began with this statement: Leaders
and dignitaries of the European Union; representatives of our NATO
Alliance; distinguished guests: We meet here at a moment of testing for
Europe and the United States, and for the international order (New
World Order) that we have worked for GENERATIONS TO BUILD .
and dignitaries of the European Union; representatives of our NATO
Alliance; distinguished guests: We meet here at a moment of testing for
Europe and the United States, and for the international order (New
World Order) that we have worked for GENERATIONS TO BUILD .
Conclusion of Obama’s Brussels speech to the European Youth:
In the end, the success of our
ideals comes down to us — including the example of our own lives, our
own societies. We know that there will always be intolerance. But
instead of fearing the immigrant, we can welcome him. We can insist on
policies that benefit the many, not just the few; that an age of
globalization and dizzying change opens the door of opportunity to the
marginalized, and not just a privileged few. Instead of targeting our
gay and lesbian brothers and sisters, we can use our laws to protect
their rights. Instead of defining ourselves in opposition to others, we
can affirm the aspirations that we hold in common. That’s what will
make America strong. That’s what will make Europe strong. That’s what
makes us who we are.
ideals comes down to us — including the example of our own lives, our
own societies. We know that there will always be intolerance. But
instead of fearing the immigrant, we can welcome him. We can insist on
policies that benefit the many, not just the few; that an age of
globalization and dizzying change opens the door of opportunity to the
marginalized, and not just a privileged few. Instead of targeting our
gay and lesbian brothers and sisters, we can use our laws to protect
their rights. Instead of defining ourselves in opposition to others, we
can affirm the aspirations that we hold in common. That’s what will
make America strong. That’s what will make Europe strong. That’s what
makes us who we are.
And just as we meet our
responsibilities as individuals, we must be prepared to meet them as
nations. Because we live in a world in which our ideals are going to be
challenged again and again by forces that would drag us back into
conflict or corruption. We can’t count on others to rise to meet those
tests. The policies of your government, the principles of your European
Union, will make a critical difference in whether or not the
international order that so many generations before you have strived to
create continues to move forward, or whether it retreats.
responsibilities as individuals, we must be prepared to meet them as
nations. Because we live in a world in which our ideals are going to be
challenged again and again by forces that would drag us back into
conflict or corruption. We can’t count on others to rise to meet those
tests. The policies of your government, the principles of your European
Union, will make a critical difference in whether or not the
international order that so many generations before you have strived to
create continues to move forward, or whether it retreats.
The New World order has arrived. It all started in 1910, when
a group of international bankers secretly met on a small island off the
coast of Georgia. Their plan: to formulate a program to destroy the
financial structure of America. To do that, they pushed Woodrow Wilson
into the presidency; and in 1913, Wilson signed into law, the Federal
Reserve Act and the Federal Income Tax. In 1921, these international
bankers established the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).
a group of international bankers secretly met on a small island off the
coast of Georgia. Their plan: to formulate a program to destroy the
financial structure of America. To do that, they pushed Woodrow Wilson
into the presidency; and in 1913, Wilson signed into law, the Federal
Reserve Act and the Federal Income Tax. In 1921, these international
bankers established the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).
The U.S. Government took advantage of the CFR’s experience
in finance and foreign affairs, and one of their study groups, the
Advisory Committee on Post-War Foreign Policy, became part of the State
Department in 1941. The secret goal of this study group was to condition
the Congress, and the people of this country to accept the
establishment of the United Nations (UN). The UN, initiated in 1945,
does not seek to promote world peace and cooperation– it was the first
step towards a one-world government, which is now referred to as the New
World Order.
in finance and foreign affairs, and one of their study groups, the
Advisory Committee on Post-War Foreign Policy, became part of the State
Department in 1941. The secret goal of this study group was to condition
the Congress, and the people of this country to accept the
establishment of the United Nations (UN). The UN, initiated in 1945,
does not seek to promote world peace and cooperation– it was the first
step towards a one-world government, which is now referred to as the New
World Order.
The CFR is a subsidiary of the Round Table Organization, a
group of British Elitists controlled by the most powerful family in the
world– the Rothschilds, who, through an organization known as the
Illuminati, have been controlling world events since 1776. The
Illuminati controls world leaders and the money that runs their
countries. They can elect a President, and they can kill a President.
They can shut-off the oil, and plunge the world into war. Even though
they operate under the strictest secrecy, their goals have been known
for over 2,000 years.
group of British Elitists controlled by the most powerful family in the
world– the Rothschilds, who, through an organization known as the
Illuminati, have been controlling world events since 1776. The
Illuminati controls world leaders and the money that runs their
countries. They can elect a President, and they can kill a President.
They can shut-off the oil, and plunge the world into war. Even though
they operate under the strictest secrecy, their goals have been known
for over 2,000 years.
25_Goals of the Satanic Illuminati New World Order:
1. All men are more easily inclined towards evil than good.
2. Preach Liberalism
3. Use the idea of freedom to bring about ‘class wars’
4. Any and all means should be used to reach the Illuminati Goals as they are justified.
5. The right to lie in force.
6. The power of our resources must remain invisible until the
very moment it has gained the strength that no cunning or force can
undermine it.
7. Avocation of mob psychology to control the masses.
8. Use alcohol, drugs, corruption and all forms of vice to systematically corrupt the youth of the nation.
9. Seize property by any means necessary.
10. Use of slogans such as equity, liberty, fraternity delivered into the mouths of the masses in psychological warfare.
11. War should be directed so that the nations on both sides
are placed further in debt and peace conferences conducted so that
neither combatant obtains territory rights.
12. Members must use their wealth to have candidates chosen and placed
in public office who will be obedient to their demands and will be used
as pawns in the game by those behind the scenes. Their advisors will
have been reared and trained from childhood to rule the affairs of the
world.
13. Control the press.
14. Agents will come forward after fermenting traumatic situations and appear to be the saviors of the masses.
15. Create industrial depression and financial panic,
unemployment, hunger, shortage of food and use this to control the
masses or mob and then use the mob to wipe out all those who stand in
the way.
16. Infiltrate into the secret Freemasons to use them for Illuminati purposes.
17. Expound the value of systematic deception, use high
sounding slogans and phrases and advocate lavish promises to the masses
even though they cannot be kept.
18. Detail plans for resolutions, discuss the art of ‘street
fighting’ which is necessary to bring the population into speedy
subjection.
19. Use agents as advisors behind the scenes after wars and use secret diplomacy to gain control.
20. Establish huge monopolies that lean toward world government control.
21. Use high taxes and unfair competition to bring about
economic ruin by control of raw materials. Organize agitation among the
workers and subsidize their competitors.
22. Build up armaments with Police forces and Soldiers sufficient to protect our needs.
23. Members and leaders of the one world government would be appointed
by the directors.
24. Infiltrate into all classes and levels of society and
government for the purpose of fooling, bemusing and corrupting the
youthful members of society by teaching them theories and principles
that we know to be false.
25. National and International laws should be used to destroy civilization and enslave and control the people.
The New World Order has been a hidden agenda of secret
societies. The overall plan for world “governance” is a work in
progress. It subject to continuous adjustment by the roundtables as
history moves on down the line.
The ten global bio-regions, (currently economic and banking
regions), have actually have been marked out on a map and given new
names. People living inside those new borders are beginning to vaguely
realize that their national borders are no longer guarded and becoming
quite porous. In spite of nationalistic protests certain boundaries are
in many cases just fading away.
New political boundaries have been mapped out for the world
to conform to the global or geo-economic banking regions that are now
forming. This New World Order map showing ten geo-political regions was created early in 1941 several months before the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor.
The ten future global powers and their eventual leaders have
not yet emerged into history. (Dan 7) But they most certainly will.
Daniel said that these ten powers would rise up in the latter days of
this age. Eventually they would be ruled over by one man, a certain
“prince”. (See Daniel 9:24,25,26,&27.)
All countries will loose what ever sovereignty they have left. Becoming part of a global society, one world government.
For Americans this will be a very traumatic change to their lifestyle. We
take our current peace for granted. But let us take a longer historic
view. The United States looks like being the last in a long line of
western Christian superpowers. Each took their turn in leading the way
throughout the centuries.
But this history must unfold. The chronicles of God’s people
must be written, and they will be written. There will be crises to be
sure. And crisis managers will rise up calling for further compromises.
The money will not be there to deal. And on a terrible future day the flags and sovereignties of nations will folded up and placed down on the dealing table.
The final world system will then emerge, supposedly to try and deal with all this economic and political turmoil. Strange to say, it will be during this time of chaos that the New World Order, under a covering harlot religious system, a prince will sneak in and assume enormous international powers.
Apparently this coming prince will be quite an impressive and
persuasive orator when he comes on the scene. Stepping aside to allow
“the lady” to go first will be his subtle move. Working behind the
scenes he will be a very capable crisis manager on a global scale. He
will pull strings and get things done by treaty, entering into the key
places of conflict in the world, not least of which is the Holy Land and
the city of Jerusalem.
All Christians should understand that it will do them no good
to fight the beast and the coming New World Order for in the scripture
it is written. Revelations 17:17 For God hath put in
their hearts to fulfil his will, and to agree, and give their kingdom
unto the beast, until the words of God shall be fulfilled.
Jesus is coming, evil shall soon taste the rath of the Lord our God.
Critical Reads: More News mainstream Media Chooses To Ignore By Josey Wales, Click Here!
For years, constitution. leaders
in education, industry, the media, banking, etc., have promoted those
with the same Weltanschauung (world view) as theirs. Of course, someone
might say that just because individuals promote their friends doesn’t
constitute a conspiracy. That’s true in the usual sense. However, it
does represent an “open conspiracy,” as described by noted Fabian
Socialist H.G. Wells in The Open Conspiracy: Blue Prints for a World Revolution (1928).
In 1913, prior to the passage of the Federal Reserve Act President Wilson’s The New Freedom was published, in which he revealed:
“Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men’s views
confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the U. S., in the
field of commerce and manufacturing, are afraid of somebody, are afraid
of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so
subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that
they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in
condemnation of it.”
On November 21, 1933, President Franklin Roosevelt wrote a letter to
Col. Edward Mandell House, President Woodrow Wilson’s close advisor:
“The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that
a financial element in the larger centers has owned the Government ever
since the days of Andrew Jackson… “
That there is such a thing as a cabal of power brokers who control
government behind the scenes has been detailed several times in this
century by credible sources. Professor Carroll Quigley was Bill
Clinton’s mentor at Georgetown University. President Clinton has
publicly paid homage to the influence Professor Quigley had on his life.
In Quigley’s magnum opus Tragedy and Hope (1966), he states:
“There does exist and has existed for a generation, an
international … network which operates, to some extent, in the way the
radical right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which
we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to
cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups and frequently does
so. I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it
for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960s, to
examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to
most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to
many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently,
to a few of its policies… but in general my chief difference of opinion
is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history
is significant enough to be known.”
Even talk show host Rush Limbaugh, an outspoken critic of anyone
claiming a push for global government, said on his February 7, 1995
program:
“You see, if you amount to anything in Washington these
days, it is because you have been plucked or handpicked from an Ivy
League school — Harvard, Yale, Kennedy School of Government — you’ve
shown an aptitude to be a good Ivy League type, and so you’re plucked
so-to-speak, and you are assigned success. You are assigned a certain
role in government somewhere, and then your success is monitored and
tracked, and you go where the pluckers and the handpickers can put you.”
On May 4, 1993, Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) president Leslie Gelb said on The Charlie Rose Show that:
“… you [Charlie Rose] had me on [before] to talk about
the New World Order! I talk about it all the time. It’s one world now.
The Council [CFR] can find, nurture, and begin to put people in the
kinds of jobs this country needs. And that’s going to be one of the
major enterprises of the Council under me.”
Previous CFR chairman, John J. McCloy (1953-70), actually said they have been doing this since the 1940s (and before).
The thrust towards global government can be well-documented but at
the end of the twentieth century it does not look like a traditional
conspiracy in the usual sense of a secret cabal of evil men meeting
clandestinely behind closed doors. Rather, it is a “networking” of
like-minded individuals in high places to achieve a common goal, as
described in Marilyn Ferguson’s 1980 insider classic, The Aquarian Conspiracy.
Perhaps the best way to relate this would be a brief history of the
New World Order, not in our words but in the words of those who have
been striving to make it real.
1912 – Colonel Edward M. House, a close advisor of President Woodrow Wilson, publishes Phillip Dru: Administrator in which he promotes “socialism as dreamed of by Karl Marx.”
1913 – The Federal Reserve (neither federal nor a
reserve) is created. It was planned at a secret meeting in 1910 on Jekyl
Island, Georgia by a group of bankers and politicians, including Col.
House. This transferred the power to create money from the American
government to a private group of bankers. It is probably the largest
generator of debt in the world.
May 30, 1919 – Prominent British and American personalities establish the Royal Institute of International Affairs in England and the Institute of International Affairs
in the U.S. at a meeting arranged by Col. House attended by various
Fabian socialists, including noted economist John Maynard Keynes. Two
years later, Col. House reorganizes the Institute of International
Affairs into the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).
December 15, 1922 – The CFR endorses World Government in its magazine Foreign Affairs. Author Philip Kerr, states:
“Obviously there is going to be no peace or prosperity
for mankind as long as [the earth] remains divided into 50 or 60
independent states until some kind of international system is created…
The real problem today is that of the world government.”
1928 — The Open Conspiracy: Blue Prints for a World Revolution by H.G. Wells is published. A former Fabian Socialist, Wells writes:
“The political world of the … Open Conspiracy must
weaken, efface, incorporate and supersede existing governments… The Open
Conspiracy is the natural inheritor of socialist and communist
enthusiasms; it may be in control of Moscow before it is in control of
New York… The character of the Open Conspiracy will now be plainly
displayed… It will be a world religion.”
1931 – Students at the Lenin School of Political Warfare in Moscow are taught:
“One day we shall start to spread the most theatrical
peace movement the world has ever seen. The capitalist countries, stupid
and decadent … will fall into the trap offered by the possibility of
making new friends. Our day will come in 30 years or so… The bourgeoisie
must be lulled into a false sense of security.”
1931 – In a speech to the Institute for the Study of International Affairs at Copenhagen) historian Arnold Toyee said:
“We are at present working discreetly with all our might
to wrest this mysterious force called sovereignty out of the clutches of
the local nation states of the world. All the time we are denying with
our lips what we are doing with our hands….”
1932 – New books are published urging World Order:
Toward Soviet America by William Z. Foster. Head of the Communist Party USA, Foster indicates that a National Department of Education would be one of the means used to develop a new socialist society in the U.S.
The New World Order by F.S. Marvin,
describing the League of Nations as the first attempt at a New World
Order. Marvin says, “nationality must rank below the claims of mankind
as a whole.”
Dare the School Build a New Social Order? is published. Educator author George Counts asserts that:
“… the teachers should deliberately reach for power and
then make the most of their conquest” in order to “influence the social
attitudes, ideals and behavior of the coming generation… The growth of
science and technology has carried us into a new age where ignorance
must be replaced by knowledge, competition by cooperation, trust in
Providence by careful planning and private capitalism by some form of
social economy.”
1933 – The first Humanist Manifesto is published.
Co-author John Dewey, the noted philosopher and educator, calls for a
synthesizing of all religions and “a socialized and cooperative economic
order.” Co-signer C.F. Potter said in 1930:
“Education is thus a most powerful ally of humanism, and
every American public school is a school of humanism. What can the
theistic Sunday schools, meeting for an hour once a week, teaching only a
fraction of the children, do to stem the tide of a five-day program of
humanistic teaching?”
1933 — The Shape of Things to Come by H.G.
Wells is published. Wells predicts a second world war around 1940,
originating from a German-Polish dispute. After 1945 there would be an
increasing lack of public safety in “criminally infected” areas. The
plan for the “Modern World-State” would succeed on its third attempt
(about 1980), and come out of something that occurred in Basra, Iraq.
The book also states,
“Although world government had been plainly coming for
some years, although it had been endlessly feared and murmured against,
it found no opposition prepared anywhere.”
1934 — The Externalization of the Hierarchy
by Alice A. Bailey is published. Bailey is an occultist, whose works
are channeled from a spirit guide, the Tibetan Master [demon spirit]
Djwahl Kuhl. Bailey uses the phrase “points of light” in connection with
a “New Group of World Servers” and claims that 1934 marks the beginning of “the
organizing of the men and women… group work of a new order… [with]
progress defined by service… the world of the Brotherhood… the Forces of
Light… [and] out of the spoliation of all existing culture and
civilization, the new world order must be built.”
The book is published by the Lucis Trust, incorporated originally in New York as the Lucifer Publishing Company. Lucis Trust
is a United Nations NGO and has been a major player at the recent U.N.
summits. Later Assistant Secretary General of the U.N. Robert Mueller
would credit the creation of his World Core Curriculum for education to
the underlying teachings of Djwahl Kuhl via Alice Bailey’s writings on
the subject.
1932 — Plan for Peace by American Birth
Control League founder Margaret Sanger (1921) is published. She calls
for coercive sterilization, mandatory segregation, and rehabilitative
concentration camps for all “dysgenic stocks” including Blacks,
Hispanics, American Indians and Catholics.
October 28, 1939 – In an address by John Foster
Dulles, later U.S. Secretary of State, he proposes that America lead the
transition to a new order of less independent, semi-sovereign states
bound together by a league or federal union.
1939 — New World Order by H. G. Wells proposes a collectivist one-world state”‘ or “new world order” comprised of “socialist democracies.” He advocates “universal conscription for service” and declares that “nationalist individualism… is the world’s disease.” He continues:
“The manifest necessity for some collective world control
to eliminate warfare and the less generally admitted necessity for a
collective control of the economic and biological life of mankind, are
aspects of one and the same process.” He proposes that this be
accomplished through “universal law” and propaganda (or education).”
1940 — The New World Order is published by
the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and contains a select
list of references on regional and world federation, together with some
special plans for world order after the war.
December 12, 1940 — In The Congressional Record an article entitled A New World Order John G. Alexander calls for a world federation.
1942 – The leftist Institute of Pacific Relations publishes Post War Worlds by P.E. Corbett:
“World government is the ultimate aim… It must be
recognized that the law of nations takes precedence over national law…
The process will have to be assisted by the deletion of the
nationalistic material employed in educational textbooks and its
replacement by material explaining the benefits of wiser association.”
June 28, 1945 – President Truman endorses world government in a speech:
“It will be just as easy for nations to get along in a
republic of the world as it is for us to get along in a republic of the
United States.”
October 24, 1945 – The United Nations Charter
becomes effective. Also on October 24, Senator Glen Taylor (D-Idaho)
introduces Senate Resolution 183 calling upon the U.S. Senate to go on
record as favoring creation of a world republic including an
international police force.
1946 – Alger Hiss is elected President of the
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Hiss holds this office until
1949. Early in 1950, he is convicted of perjury and sentenced to prison
after a sensational trial and Congressional hearing in which Whittaker
Chambers, a former senior editor of Time, testifies that Hiss was a member of his Communist Party cell.
1946 — The Teacher and World Government by former editor of the NEA Journal (National Education Association) Joy Elmer Morgan is published. He says:
“In the struggle to establish an adequate world
government, the teacher… can do much to prepare the hearts and minds of
children for global understanding and cooperation… At the very heart of
all the agencies which will assure the coming of world government must
stand the school, the teacher, and the organized profession.”
1947 – The American Education Fellowship, formerly the Progressive Education Association, organized by John Dewey, calls for the:
“… establishment of a genuine world order, an order in which national sovereignty is subordinate to world authority… “
October, 1947 – NEA Associate Secretary William Carr writes in the NEA Journal that teachers should:
“… teach about the various proposals that have been made
for the strengthening of the United Nations and the establishment of a
world citizenship and world government.”
1948 — Walden II by behavioral psychologist B.F. Skinner proposes “a perfect society or new and more perfect order”
in which children are reared by the State, rather than by their parents
and are trained from birth to demonstrate only desirable behavior and
characteristics. Skinner’s ideas would be widely implemented by
educators in the 1960s, 70s, and 80s as Values Clarification and Outcome Based Education.
July, 1948 – Britain’s Sir Harold Butler, in the CFR’s Foreign Affairs, sees “a New World Order” taking shape:
“How far can the life of nations, which for centuries
have thought of themselves as distinct and unique, be merged with the
life of other nations? How far are they prepared to sacrifice a part of
their sovereignty without which there can be no effective economic or
political union?… Out of the prevailing confusion a new world is taking
shape… which may point the way toward the new order… That will be the
beginning of a real United Nations, no longer crippled by a split
personality, but held together by a common faith.”
1948 – UNESCO president and Fabian Socialist, Sir Julian Huxley, calls for a radical eugenic policy in UNESCO: Its Purpose and Its Philosophy. He states:
“Thus, even though it is quite true that any radical
eugenic policy of controlled human breeding will be for many years
politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for
UNESCO to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest
care and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake that
much that is now unthinkable may at least become thinkable.”
1948 – The preliminary draft of a World Constitution
is published by U.S. educators advocating regional federation on the
way toward world federation or government with England incorporated into
a European federation.
The Constitution provides for a “World Council” along with a “Chamber of Guardians” to enforce world law. Also included is a “Preamble” calling upon nations to surrender their arms to the world government, and includes the right of this “Federal Republic of the World” to seize private property for federal use.
February 9, 1950 – The Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee introduces Senate Concurrent Resolution 66 which begins:
“Whereas, in order to achieve universal peace and
justice, the present Charter of the United Nations should be changed to
provide a true world government constitution.”
The resolution was first introduced in the Senate on September 13,
1949 by Senator Glen Taylor (D-Idaho). Senator Alexander Wiley
(R-Wisconsin) called it “a consummation devoutly to be wished for” and said, “I
understand your proposition is either change the United Nations, or
change or create, by a separate convention, a world order.” Senator Taylor later stated:
“We would have to sacrifice considerable sovereignty to
the world organization to enable them to levy taxes in their own right
to support themselves.”
1950 – In testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, international financier James P Warburg said:
“we shall have a world government, whether or not we like
it. The question is only whether world government will be achieved by
consent or by conquest.”
April 12, 1952 – John Foster Dulles, later to become
Secretary of State, says in a speech to the American Bar Association in
Louisville, Kentucky, that “treaty laws can override the Constitution.”
He says treaties can take power away from Congress and give them to the
President. They can take powers from the States and give them to the
Federal Government or to some international body and they can cut across
the rights given to the people by their constitutional Bill of Rights. A
Senate amendment, proposed by GOP Senator John Bricker, would have
provided that no treaty could supersede the Constitution, but it fails
to pass by one vote.
1954 – Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands
establishes the Bilderbergers, international politicians and bankers who
meet secretly on an annual basis.
1954 – H. Rowan Gaither, Jr., President – Ford Foundation said to Norman Dodd of the Congressional Reese Commission:
“… all of us here at the policy-making level have had
experience with directives… from the White House… . The substance of
them is that we shall use our grant-making power so as to alter our life
in the United States that we can be comfortably merged with the Soviet
Union.”
1954 – Senator William Jenner said:
“Today the path to total dictatorship in the United
States can be laid by strictly legal means, unseen and unheard by the
Congress, the President, or the people… outwardly we have a
Constitutional government. We have operating within our government and
political system, another body representing another form of government, a
bureaucratic elite which believes our Constitution is outmoded and is
sure that it is the winning side…. All the strange
developments in the foreign policy agreements may be traced to this
group who are going to make us over to suit their pleasure…. This
political action group has its own local political support
organizations, its own pressure groups, its own vested interests, its
foothold within our government, and its own propaganda apparatus.”
1958 — World Peace through World Law is
published, where authors Grenville Clark and Louis Sohn advocate using
the U.N. as a governing body for the world, world disarmament, a world
police force and legislature.
1959 – The Council on Foreign Relations calls for a New International Order Study Number 7, issued on November 25, advocated:
“… new international order [which] must be responsive to
world aspirations for peace, for social and economic change… an
international order… including states labeling themselves as ‘socialist’
[communist].”
1959 – The World Constitution and Parliament Association is founded which later develops a Diagram of World Government under the Constitution for the Federation of Earth.
1959 — The Mid-Century Challenge to U.S. Foreign Policy is published, sponsored by the Rockefeller Brothers’ Fund. It explains that the U.S.:
“… cannot escape, and indeed should welcome… the task
which history has imposed on us. This is the task of helping to shape a
new world order in all its dimensions — spiritual, economic, political,
social.”
September 9, 1960 – President Eisenhower signs Senate Joint Resolution 170,
promoting the concept of a federal Atlantic Union. Pollster and
Atlantic Union Committee treasurer, Elmo Roper, later delivers an
address titled, The Goal Is Government of All the World, in which he states:
“For it becomes clear that the first step toward World
Government cannot be completed until we have advanced on the four
fronts: the economic, the military, the political and the social.”
1961 – The U.S. State Department issues a plan to disarm all nations and arm the United Nations. State Department Document Number 7277 is entitled Freedom From War: The U.S. Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World. It details a three-stage plan to disarm all nations and arm the U.N. with the final stage in which “no state would have the military power to challenge the progressively strengthened U.N. Peace Force.”
March 1, 1962 – Sen. Clark speaking on the floor of
the Senate about PL 87-297 which calls for the disbanding of all armed
forces and the prohibition of their re-establishment in any form
whatsoever. “… This program is the fixed, determined and approved policy of the government of the United States.”
1962 — New Calls for World Federalism. In a study titled, A World Effectively Controlled by the United Nations, CFR member Lincoln Bloomfield states:
“… if the communist dynamic was greatly abated, the West might lose whatever incentive it has for world government.”
The Future of Federalism by author Nelson Rockefeller is published. The one-time Governor of New York, claims that current events compellingly demand a “new world order,” as the old order is crumbling, and there is “a new and free order struggling to be born.” Rockefeller says there is:
“a fever of nationalism… [but] the nation-state is
becoming less and less competent to perform its international political
tasks….These are some of the reasons pressing us to lead vigorously
toward the true building of a new world order… [with] voluntary service…
and our dedicated faith in the brotherhood of all mankind…. Sooner
perhaps than we may realize… there will evolve the bases for a federal
structure of the free world.”
1963 – J. William Fulbright, Chairman of the Senate
Foreign Relations Committee speaks at a symposium sponsored by the Fund
for the Republic, a left-wing project of the Ford Foundation:
“The case for government by elites is irrefutable… government by the people is possible but highly improbable.”
1964 – Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook II is published. Author Benjamin Bloom states:
“… a large part of what we call ‘good teaching’ is the
teacher’s ability to attain affective objectives through challenging the
students’ fixed beliefs.”
His Outcome-Based Education (OBE) method of teaching would first be tried as Mastery Learning
in Chicago schools. After five years, Chicago students’ test scores had
plummeted causing outrage among parents. OBE would leave a trail of
wreckage wherever it would be tried and under whatever name it would be
used. At the same time, it would become crucial to globalists for
overhauling the education system to promote attitude changes among
school students.
1964 — Visions of Order by Richard Weaver is published. He describes:
“progressive educators as a ‘revolutionary cabal’ engaged
in ‘a systematic attempt to undermine society’s traditions and
beliefs.’”
1967 – Richard Nixon calls for New World Order.
In Asia after Vietnam, in the October issue of Foreign Affairs, Nixon
writes of nations’ dispositions to evolve regional approaches to
development needs and to the evolution of a “new world order.”
1968 – Joy Elmer Morgan, former editor of the NEA Journal publishes The American Citizens Handbook in which he says:
“the coming of the United Nations and the urgent
necessity that it evolve into a more comprehensive form of world
government places upon the citizens of the United States an increased
obligation to make the most of their citizenship which now widens into
active world citizenship.”
July 26, 1968 – Nelson Rockefeller pledges support of the New World Order. In an Associated Press report, Rockefeller pledges that, “as President, he would work toward international creation of a new world order.”
1970 – Education and the mass media promote world order. In Thinking About A New World Order for the Decade 1990, author Ian Baldwin, Jr. asserts that:
“… the World Law Fund has begun a worldwide research and
educational program that will introduce a new, emerging discipline —
world order — into educational curricula throughout the world… and to
concentrate some of its energies on bringing basic world order concepts
into the mass media again on a worldwide level.”
1972 – President Nixon visits China. In his toast to
Chinese Premier Chou En-lai, former CFR member and now President,
Richard Nixon, expresses “the hope that each of us has to build a new world order.”
May 18, 1972 – In speaking of the coming of world government, Roy M. Ash, director of the Office of Management and Budget, declares that:
“within two decades the institutional framework for a
world economic community will be in place… [and] aspects of individual
sovereignty will be given over to a supernational authority.”
1973 – The Trilateral Commission is
established. Banker David Rockefeller organizes this new private body
and chooses Zbigniew Brzezinski, later National Security Advisor to
President Carter, as the Commission’s first director and invites Jimmy
Carter to become a founding member.
1973 — Humanist Manifesto II is published:
“The next century can be and should be the humanistic
century… we stand at the dawn of a new age… a secular society on a
planetary scale…. As non-theists we begin with humans not God, nature
not deity… we deplore the division of humankind on nationalistic
grounds…. Thus we look to the development of a system of world law and a
world order based upon transnational federal government…. The true
revolution is occurring.”
April, 1974 – Former U. S. Deputy Assistant Secretary of State, Trilateralist and CFR member Richard Gardner’s article The Hard Road to World Order is published in the CFR’s Foreign Affairs where he states that:
“the ‘house of world order’ will have to be built from
the bottom up rather than from the top down… but an end run around
national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much
more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.”
1974 – The World Conference of Religion for Peace, held in Louvain, Belgium is held. Douglas Roche presents a report entitled We Can Achieve a New World Order.
The U.N. calls for wealth redistribution: In a report entitled New International Economic Order, the U.N. General Assembly outlines a plan to redistribute the wealth from the rich to the poor nations.
1975 – A study titled, A New World Order,
is published by the Center of International Studies, Woodrow Wilson
School of Public and International Studies, Princeton University.
1975 – In Congress, 32 Senators and 92 Representatives sign A Declaration of Interdependence, written by historian Henry Steele Commager. The Declaration states that:
“we must join with others to bring forth a new world
order… Narrow notions of national sovereignty must not be permitted to
curtail that obligation.”
Congresswoman Marjorie Holt refuses to sign the Declaration saying:
“It calls for the surrender of our national sovereignty
to international organizations. It declares that our economy should be
regulated by international authorities. It proposes that we enter a ‘new
world order’ that would redistribute the wealth created by the American
people.”
1975 – Retired Navy Admiral Chester Ward, former
Judge Advocate General of the U.S. Navy and former CFR member, writes in
a critique that the goal of the CFR is the “submergence of U. S. sovereignty and national independence into an all powerful one-world government… “
1975 — Kissinger on the Couch is published. Authors Phyllis Schlafly and former CFR member Chester Ward state:
“Once the ruling members of the CFR have decided that the
U.S. government should espouse a particular policy, the very
substantial research facilities of the CFR are put to work to develop
arguments, intellectual and emotional, to support the new policy and to
confound, discredit, intellectually and politically, any opposition… “
1976 – RIO: Reshaping the International Order is published by the globalist Club of Rome, calling for a new international order, including an economic redistribution of wealth.
1977 – The Third Try at World Order is published. Author Harlan Cleveland of the Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies calls for:
“changing Americans’ attitudes and institutions” for “complete disarmament (except for international soldiers)” and “for individual entitlement to food, health and education.”
1977 — Imperial Brain Trust by Laurence
Shoup and William Minter is published. The book takes a critical look at
the Council on Foreign Relations with chapters such as: Shaping a New World Order: The Council’s Blueprint for Global Hegemony, 1939-1944 and Toward the 1980′s: The Council’s Plans for a New World Order.
1977 — The Trilateral Connection appears in the July edition of Atlantic Monthly. Written by Jeremiah Novak, it says:
“For the third time in this century, a group of American
schools, businessmen, and government officials is planning to fashion a
New World Order… “
1977 – Leading educator Mortimer Adler publishes Philosopher at Large in which he says:
“… if local civil government is necessary for local civil peace, then world civil government is necessary for world peace.”
1979 – Barry Goldwater, retiring Republican Senator from Arizona, publishes his autobiography With No Apologies. He writes:
“In my view The Trilateral Commission represents a
skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four
centers of power — political, monetary, intellectual, and
ecclesiastical. All this is to be done in the interest of creating a
more peaceful, more productive world community. What the Trilateralists
truly intend is the creation of a worldwide economic power superior to
the political governments of the nation-states involved. They believe
the abundant materialism they propose to create will overwhelm existing
differences. As managers and creators of the system they will rule the
future.”
1984 — The Power to Lead is published. Author James McGregor Burns admits:
“The framers of the U.S. constitution have simply been
too shrewd for us. The have outwitted us. They designed separate
institutions that cannot be unified by mechanical linkages, frail
bridges, tinkering. If we are to ‘turn the Founders upside down’ — we
must directly confront the constitutional structure they erected.”
1985 – Norman Cousins, the honorary chairman of Planetary Citizens for the World We Chose, is quoted in Human Events:
“World government is coming, in fact, it is inevitable. No arguments for or against it can change that fact.”
Cousins was also president of the World Federalist Association, an affiliate of the World Association for World Federation (WAWF), headquartered in Amsterdam. WAWF is a leading force for world federal government and is accredited by the U.N. as a Non-Governmental Organization.
1987 — The Secret Constitution and the Need for Constitutional Change is sponsored in part by the Rockefeller Foundation. Some thoughts of author Arthur S. Miller are:
“… a pervasive system of thought control exists in the
United States… the citizenry is indoctrinated by employment of the mass
media and the system of public education… people are told what to think
about… the old order is crumbling… Nationalism should be seen as a
dangerous social disease… A new vision is required to plan and manage
the future, a global vision that will transcend national boundaries and
eliminate the poison of nationalistic solutions… a new Constitution is
necessary.”
1988 – Former Under-secretary of State and CFR member George Ball in a January 24 interview in the New York Times says:
“The Cold War should no longer be the kind of obsessive
concern that it is. Neither side is going to attack the other
deliberately… If we could internationalize by using the U.N. in
conjunction with the Soviet Union, because we now no longer have to
fear, in most cases, a Soviet veto, then we could begin to transform the
shape of the world and might get the U.N. back to doing something
useful… Sooner or later we are going to have to face restructuring our
institutions so that they are not confined merely to the nation-states.
Start first on a regional and ultimately you could move to a world
basis.“
December 7, 1988 – In an address to the U.N., Mikhail Gorbachev calls for mutual consensus:
“World progress is only possible through a search for universal human consensus as we move forward to a new world order.”
May 12, 1989 – President Bush invites the Soviets to join World Order.
Speaking to the graduating class at Texas A&M University, Mr. Bush
states that the United States is ready to welcome the Soviet Union “back into the world order.”
1989 – Carl Bernstein’s (Woodward and Bernstein of Watergate fame) book Loyalties: A Son’s Memoir is published. His father and mother had been members of the Communist party. Bernstein’s father tells his son about the book:
“You’re going to prove [Sen. Joseph] McCarthy was right,
because all he was saying is that the system was loaded with Communists.
And he was right… I’m worried about the kind of book you’re going to
write and about cleaning up McCarthy. The problem is that everybody said
he was a liar; you’re saying he was right… I agree that the Party was a
force in the country.”
1990 — The World Federalist Association
faults the American press. Writing in their Summer/Fall newsletter,
Deputy Director Eric Cox describes world events over the past year or
two and declares:
“It’s sad but true that the slow-witted American press
has not grasped the significance of most of these developments. But most
federalists know what is happening… And they are not frightened by the
old bug-a-boo of sovereignty.”
September 11, 1990 – President Bush calls the Gulf War an opportunity for the New World Order. In an address to Congress entitled Toward a New World Order, Mr. Bush says:
“The crisis in the Persian Gulf offers a rare opportunity
to move toward an historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled
times… a new world order can emerge in which the nations of the world,
east and west, north and south, can prosper and live in harmony…. Today
the new world is struggling to be born.”
September 25, 1990 – In an address to the U.N., Soviet Foreign Minister Eduard Shevardnadze describes Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait as “an act of terrorism [that] has been perpetrated against the emerging New World Order.” On December 31, Gorbachev declares that the New World Order would be ushered in by the Gulf Crisis.
October 1, 1990 – In a U.N. address, President Bush speaks of the:
“… collective strength of the world community expressed
by the U.N. … an historic movement towards a new world order… a new
partnership of nations… a time when humankind came into its own… to
bring about a revolution of the spirit and the mind and begin a journey
into a… new age.”
1991 – Author Linda MacRae-Campbell publishes How to Start a Revolution at Your School in the publication In Context. She promotes the use of “change agents” as “self-acknowledged revolutionaries” and “co-conspirators.”
1991 – President Bush praises the New World Order in a State of Union Message:
“What is at stake is more than one small country, it is a
big idea — a new world order… to achieve the universal aspirations of
mankind… based on shared principles and the rule of law…. The
illumination of a thousand points of light…. The winds of change are
with us now.”
February 6, 1991 – President Bush tells the Economic Club of New York:
“My vision of a new world order foresees a United Nations with a revitalized peacekeeping function.”
June, 1991 – The Council on Foreign Relations co-sponsors an assembly Rethinking America’s Security: Beyond Cold War to New World Order
which is attended by 65 prestigious members of government, labor,
academia, the media, military, and the professions from nine countries.
Later, several of the conference participants joined some 100 other
world leaders for another closed door meeting of the Bilderberg Society in Baden Baden, Germany. The Bilderbergers
also exert considerable clout in determining the foreign policies of
their respective governments. While at that meeting, David Rockefeller
said in a speech:
“We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York
Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have
attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for
almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our
plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity
during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and
prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational
sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely
preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past
centuries.”
July, 1991 – The Southeastern World Affairs Institute discusses the New World Order. In a program, topics include, Legal Structures for a New World Order and The United Nations: From its Conception to a New World Order.
Participants include a former director of the U.N.’s General Legal
Division, and a former Secretary General of International Planned
Parenthood.
Late July, 1991 – On a Cable News Network program,
CFR member and former CIA director Stansfield Turner (Rhodes scholar),
when asked about Iraq, responded:
“We have a much bigger objective. We’ve got to look at
the long run here. This is an example — the situation between the United
Nations and Iraq — where the United Nations is deliberately intruding
into the sovereignty of a sovereign nation… Now this is a marvelous
precedent (to be used in) all countries of the world… “
October 29, 1991 – David Funderburk, former U. S. Ambassador to Romania, tells a North Carolina audience:
“George Bush has been surrounding himself with people who
believe in one-world government. They believe that the Soviet system
and the American system are converging.” The vehicle to bring this
about, said Funderburk, is the United Nations, “the majority of whose
166 member states are socialist, atheist, and anti-American.”
Funderburk served as ambassador in Bucharest from 1981 to 1985, when
he resigned in frustration over U.S. support of the oppressive regime of
the late Rumanian dictator, Nicolae Ceausescu.
October 30, 1991: – President Gorbachev at the Middle East Peace Talks in Madrid states:
“We are beginning to see practical support. And this is a
very significant sign of the movement towards a new era, a new age… We
see both in our country and elsewhere… ghosts of the old thinking… When
we rid ourselves of their presence, we will be better able to move
toward a new world order… relying on the relevant mechanisms of the
United Nations.”
Elsewhere, in Alexandria, Virginia, Elena Lenskaya, Counsellor to the
Minister of Education of Russia, delivers the keynote address for a
program titled, Education for a New World Order.
1992 — The Twilight of Sovereignty by CFR member (and former Citicorp Chairman) Walter Wriston is published, in which he claims:
“A truly global economy will require … compromises of national sovereignty… There is no escaping the system.”
1992 — The United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) Earth Summit
takes place in Rio de Janeiro this year, headed by Conference
Secretary-General Maurice Strong. The main products of this summit are
the Biodiversity Treaty and Agenda 21, which the U.S. hesitates to sign
because of opposition at home due to the threat to sovereignty and
economics. The summit says the first world’s wealth must be transferred
to the third world.
July 20, 1992 – Time magazine publishes The Birth of the Global Nation by Strobe Talbott, Rhodes Scholar, roommate of Bill Clinton at Oxford University, CFR Director, and Trilateralist, in which he writes:
“All countries are basically social arrangements… No
matter how permanent or even sacred they may seem at any one time, in
fact they are all artificial and temporary… Perhaps national sovereignty
wasn’t such a great idea after all… But it has taken the events in our
own wondrous and terrible century to clinch the case for world
government.”
As an editor of Time, Talbott defended Clinton during his
presidential campaign. He was appointed by President Clinton as the
number two person at the State Department behind Secretary of State
Warren Christopher, former Trilateralist and former CFR Vice-Chairman
and Director. Talbott was confirmed by about two-thirds of the U.S.
Senate despite his statement about the unimportance of national
sovereignty.
September 29, 1992 – At a town hall meeting in Los Angeles, Trilateralist and former CFR president Winston Lord delivers a speech titled Changing Our Ways: America and the New World, in which he remarks:
“To a certain extent, we are going to have to yield some
of our sovereignty, which will be controversial at home… [Under] the
North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)… some Americans are going to
be hurt as low-wage jobs are taken away.”
Lord became an Assistant Secretary of State in the Clinton administration.
1992 – President Bush addressing the General Assembly of the U.N said:
“It is the sacred principles enshrined in the United
Nations charter to which the American people will henceforth pledge
their allegiance.”
Winter, 1992-93 – The CFR’s Foreign Affairs publishes Empowering the United Nations by U.N. Secretary General Boutros-Boutros Ghali, who asserts:
“It is undeniable that the centuries-old doctrine of
absolute and exclusive sovereignty no longer stands… Underlying the
rights of the individual and the rights of peoples is a dimension of
universal sovereignty that resides in all humanity… It is a sense that
increasingly finds expression in the gradual expansion of international
law… In this setting the significance of the United Nations should be
evident and accepted.”
1993 – Strobe Talbott receives the Norman Cousins Global Governance Award for his 1992 Time article, The Birth of the Global Nation
and in appreciation for what he has done “for the cause of global
governance.” President Clinton writes a letter of congratulation which
states:
“Norman Cousins worked for world peace and world
government…. Strobe Talbott’s lifetime achievements as a voice for
global harmony have earned him this recognition… He will be a worthy
recipient of the Norman Cousins Global Governance Award. Best wishes…
for future success.”
Not only does President Clinton use the specific term, “world
government,” but he also expressly wishes the WFA “future success” in
pursuing world federal government. Talbott proudly accepts the award,
but says the WFA should have given it to the other nominee, Mikhail
Gorbachev.
July 18, 1993 – CFR member and Trilateralist Henry Kissinger writes in the Los Angeles Times concerning NAFTA:
“What Congress will have before it is not a conventional
trade agreement but the architecture of a new international system… a
first step toward a new world order.”
August 23, 1993 – Christopher Hitchens, Socialist friend of Bill Clinton when he was at Oxford University, says in a C-SPAN interview:
“… it is, of course the case that there is a ruling class in this country, and that it has allies internationally.”
October 30, 1993 – Washington Post ombudsman Richard Harwood does an op-ed piece about the role of the CFR’s media members:
“Their membership is an acknowledgment of their ascension
into the American ruling class [where] they do not merely analyze and
interpret foreign policy for the United States; they help make it.”
January/February, 1994 – The CFR’s Foreign Affairs
prints an opening article by CFR Senior Fellow Michael Clough in which
he writes that the “Wise Men” (e.g. Paul Nitze, Dean Acheson, George
Kennan, and John J. McCloy) have:
“assiduously guarded it [American foreign policy] for the
past 50 years… They ascended to power during World War II… This was as
it should be. National security and the national interest, they argued
must transcend the special interests and passions of the people who make
up America… How was this small band of Atlantic-minded
internationalists able to triumph … Eastern internationalists were able
to shape and staff the burgeoning foreign policy institutions… As long
as the Cold War endured and nuclear Armageddon seemed only a missile
away, the public was willing to tolerate such an undemocratic foreign
policy making system.”
1994 – In the Human Development Report, published by the UN Development Program, there was a section called “Global Governance For the 21st Century”.
The administrator for this program was appointed by Bill Clinton. His
name is James Gustave Speth. The opening sentence of the report said:
“Mankind’s problems can no longer be solved by national
government. What is needed is a World Government. This can best be
achieved by strengthening the United Nations system.”
1995 – The State of the World Forum took place in
the fall of this year, sponsored by the Gorbachev Foundation located at
the Presidio in San Francisco. Foundation President Jim Garrison chairs
the meeting of who’s-whos from around the world including Margaret
Thatcher, Maurice Strong, George Bush, Mikhail Gorbachev and others.
Conversation centers around the oneness of mankind and the coming global
government. However, the term “global governance” is now used in place
of “new world order” since the latter has become a political liability,
being a lightning rod for opponents of global government.
1996 – The United Nations 420-page report Our Global Neighborhood is published. It outlines a plan for “global governance,” calling for an international Conference on Global Governance in 1998 for the purpose of submitting to the world the necessary treaties and agreements for ratification by the year 2000.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)